• Home
  • Math 8
  • Algebra
  • Geometry
  • Portfolio
    • Reflects On Teaching
    • Maintains Accurate Records
    • Communicates With Families
    • Participates in a Professional Community
    • Grows and Develops Professionally
    • Shows Professionalism
    • Professional Growth Plan
    • Sample Lesson Plans
  • Cool Stuff
    • Take a Break >
      • Help
  • For Teachers
  • Contact Me
  Elizabeth Lynn's Math Adventure
Elizabeth Lynn's Math Adventure

Thursday: Parent teacher conferences, no school

11/13/2014

0 Comments

 
Unit 2 was a valuable learning experience for me. It was not as cohesive as unit 1 and kids did not learn as much or as meaningfully.  I've been thinking a lot about this and here's what I got so far:

1. For many different reasons, I didn't focus on the learning targets as much as I did in unit 1 and I think learning suffered as a result.  I had each daily question posted, but wasn't disciplined about having kids add to them as we progressed.  It seems like we all lost our focus as a result.

2. While what we used to do with scientific notation was waaaaaaaay too much, I wish we had stuck to the unit as it was, including scientific notation.  I believe it would have reinforced the properties of exponents and given students better number sense about big and small numbers.

3.  In order to keep up, I did a lot more direct instruction. We skipped many of the tasks because they were centered on scientific notation.  Students had trouble remembering properties, would get it for a few days, then have forgotten a few days later.  It's possible this would have happened anyway, but I have a gut feeling it was the result of not allowing them to create their own meanings and have time to reflect - and therefore make connections.   One student told me during parent teacher conferences that he  kept getting the scientific notation answers correct, but he didn't understand how it was working or why he got them right.


I feel like we should re-consider our removal of scientific notation from our viable curriculum, but approach it differently than we have in the past.  It seems like it works more as a reinforcement of key concepts in the Georgia units and does not get bogged down in useless details of confusing algorithms as it does in our text book.  If we have time at the end of the year, I think it will be an easy argument to include the full unit for next year.  Including the full Georgia units will also help with getting back to the use of meaningful learning targets/essential questions. 

Overall, I had a lot of positive feedback from parents during conferences about the changes we've made to the Pre-Algebra classes.  I had three parents ask if there was any chance this could continue in Algebra.

The journey continues....

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Leaving a Trail:
    Mathematical Adventures

    We are on edge of something new and amazing. Where will this new path take us?

    Abbreviations Used:
    ISN= interactive student notebook
    WWK= words worth knowing
    PT= performance task



    Categories

    All
    Creative Process
    Elizabeth Lynn
    Future Prep
    Grows Professionally
    More Than Math
    Reflects On Teaching
    Shows Professionalism

    Picture

    Archives

    January 2019
    April 2017
    September 2016
    August 2016
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2013

    Categories

    All
    Creative Process
    Elizabeth Lynn
    Future Prep
    Grows Professionally
    More Than Math
    Reflects On Teaching
    Shows Professionalism

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Creative Process
    Elizabeth Lynn
    Future Prep
    Grows Professionally
    More Than Math
    Reflects On Teaching
    Shows Professionalism

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.